Which strategy is a speaking/listening approach that supports discourse and can be used for debate?

• A. Sentence stems
• B. Paraphrase passport
• C. Take a Stand
• D. Fishbowl

Answer: (D)

The main idea here is how to structure speaking and listening so students engage in sustained discussion and argument. A fishbowl approach does this best because it creates a live, observable conversation format: a small group sits in the center and discusses while the rest listen from the outside. After a set time, observers can rotate in to contribute, and the original speakers step out. This rotation keeps everyone involved, models respectful turn-taking, and makes thinking visible as students justify ideas, respond to evidence, and pose questions.

Fishbowl also supports debate by giving students a clear arena for argument, counterargument, and synthesis. Because the talk happens in a defined circle with roles and time limits, students learn to structure their points, listen carefully to others, and respond directly rather than speaking over one another. The outer circle’s observers develop listening skills and critical thinking as they evaluate the discussion and prepare questions or input for the next round.

Other strategies serve important language goals but don’t create the same classroom discourse dynamic. For example, sentence stems help students form sentences, which supports language output but not the collaborative debate format; paraphrase-focused activities help with understanding and restating ideas; while a Take a Stand activity focuses on taking a position, it doesn’t inherently provide the ongoing, rotating, structured discussion that a fishbowl offers for deep discourse.